Zeidler

Making History and Making it Ov Zeidler

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject English - Literature, Works, grade: 1,3, Free University of Berlin (Englische Philologie), course: Historical Novels Through Time, 5 entries in the bibliography, language: English, comment: Zitat des Dozenten: ein auf hohem analytischem und theoretischem Niveau argumentierender, gedankenreicher Essay. Die verwendete wissenschaftliche Literatur ist sehr gut ausgewählt und wird gut in die eigene Argumentation eingebunden. , abstract: Our time of demystified heroes and legends, has only a vague understanding of history and struggles for its interpretation. History in this context does not only mean the mere sequence of specific incidents and events that cannot be changed retroactively by any access to the past. This concept is furthermore a discussion on these events that is their interpretation. That means that history is and in this form it is most likely to be perceived, the connection of object and subject, referring to the events in the temporal past and its spectator in the present. This creates a subjective ribbon that connects temporal past and present by dint of an interpretive frame. Indeed the past cannot be changed, but its interpretation and analysis can be. This is exactly the approach of Stephen Fry who provides with his novel Making History a possible answer to the question, how Germany and the world might have developed without Adolf Hitler. Supported by historical facts and enriched by fictitious elements, Fry's novel affords the reader a manual for the exposure to one's own past and distorts the understanding of history of the broad majority who ascertains a single man, Adolf Hitler, to be the root for all evil. The following text tries to analyze the role of historical fiction for one's accomplishment of history in general and how Fry in particular does away with the common view that history is barely more than the sequence of big men's big actions. Therefore, I would like to proceed from the assumption that